GAME OVER | Day 10 — We Filed. Full Disclosure.
A 112-page petition filed directly with the Eastern High Court. The full Bechtle contract. The IRIS facility. The Kromann Reumert trap. Every page published. Nothing redacted.
Today I did something that nobody expected. Not Kromann Reumert. Not Danske Bank. Not the trustee who spent 59 days dismantling a company worth EUR 50 million while 4,800 creditors watched in silence.
Today, I — Mark Robert Abraham, the sole de jure director and legal representative of Shape Robotics AS — filed a 112-page petition directly with the Eastern High Court of Denmark (Østre Landsret), demanding the reopening of the bankruptcy proceedings that the Maritime and Commercial High Court annulled on March 5, 2026.
No lawyer. No intermediary. No corporate filter. Just me, the evidence, and the truth.
And I’m publishing everything.
The Petition — All 112 Pages
The full petition, with all annexes, was sent this afternoon to Post@oestrelandsret.dk with copy to the insolvency division at insolvens@shret.dk. It is 112 pages of documented facts, legal arguments, and evidence that tell the story of what happened to Shape Robotics from December 2025 through March 2026 — a period during which a law firm and a bank conspired to destroy a publicly listed company, seize its subsidiaries, redirect its revenue, and silence its CEO.
I am attaching the complete petition to this article. Every page. Every annex. Nothing redacted. Full disclosure.
The petition includes:
• The Bechtle framework agreements worth EUR 32 million (initially, now expanded to EUR 50 million with a newly signed IRIS agreement) — proving that Shape Robotics was not only solvent but thriving at the time Kromann Reumert filed for involuntary bankruptcy.
• The IRIS Capital equity facility of EUR 15 million, signed and ready, which would have funded the company’s expansion if the trustee hadn’t frozen everything.
• The CVR registry extract showing that I remain the sole registered director, never lawfully removed, never served proper notice under EU Regulation 2020/1784 Article 17.
• The Afviklingsaftale — the so-called winding-up agreement — which we argue is absolutely null and void (ugyldig) from inception.
The Afviklingsaftale Is Null
Kromann Reumert drafted a winding-up agreement (Afviklingsaftale) that purported to give the trustee sweeping powers over Shape Robotics. This agreement was drafted entirely by Kromann Reumert, in Danish, a language I do not speak. I was never given independent legal counsel. The terms were never negotiated. It was presented as a fait accompli.
Under Danish law, the principle of contra proferentem (known in Danish as koncipistreglen or uklarhedsreglen) provides that ambiguous contract terms must be interpreted against the party that drafted them. This is codified in Danish legal practice and reinforced by Aftaleloven §36.
We consider this agreement absolutely null and void. It was born from a proceeding that was itself annulled by the High Court. It cannot survive the death of its parent.
The Sanako Letter — Exhibit A of the Hostile Takeover
On January 8, 2026 — just two days after being appointed trustee — attorney Teis Gullitz-Wormslev, through his assistant Albert Mungo Madsen, sent a letter to Sanako Oy, our Finnish subsidiary valued at approximately EUR 8 million.
The letter demanded that all rights related to Shape Robotics’ shares in Sanako can only be exercised by the trustee, and all dividends and payments must be made to Kromann Reumert’s client account at Danske Bank.
Two days into the job, the trustee was already redirecting the revenue of our foreign subsidiaries to his own law firm’s bank account at Danske Bank. Not to the company. Not to the creditors. To Kromann Reumert’s client account.
This is the same Danske Bank that, as issuer agent, terminated its services to Shape Robotics — conveniently making it impossible for me to call an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM). Coincidence? Or coordination?
EUR 100,000 in Robots Sold Today
While Kromann Reumert was busy trying to declare Shape Robotics dead, we sold approximately EUR 100,000 worth of robots today. The company is not dead. It was never dead. It was attacked.
The Bechtle framework — now worth EUR 50 million with the IRIS agreement — represents one of the largest EdTech contracts in Europe. The pipeline is real. The products are shipping. The customers are paying.
Shape Robotics’ total claim for damages against Kromann Reumert is approximately EUR 100,000,000. One hundred million euros. For the destruction of shareholder value, the diversion of revenue, the illegal seizure of subsidiaries, the obstruction of corporate governance, and the deliberate, systematic dismantling of a company that was and remains commercially viable.
What Happens Next
The petition is filed. The evidence is public. The police case is active. The company is selling robots and signing contracts.
I am one person. A Romanian CEO who came to Denmark to build educational robots for children and found himself fighting alone against a system designed to crush outsiders.
No Danish lawyer will take this case — the legal establishment protects its own. So I filed the petition myself, in my own name, with my own research, and my own understanding of Danish and EU law.
This is full disclosure. The entire 112-page petition is attached below. The Sanako Oy notice from Kromann Reumert is attached below. Read them. Form your own opinion. Share them.
The 4,800 creditors and every retail investor who believed in Shape Robotics deserve the truth. Today, they have it.
—
Mark Robert Abraham
CEO & Sole Director, Shape Robotics AS
March 19, 2026
—
This is part of the GAME OVER series documenting the reconstruction of Shape Robotics AS in real time. Subscribe for daily updates.